Dynamic Semantics
Origin. Groenendijk, Stokhof, Veltman (1980s-90s). Meaning as context change. Anaphora resolution. Information update. Foundation of discourse semantics.
Models. Meaning = context change potential. Not truth conditions but update. Anaphora across sentences. Information states. Dynamic interpretation.
Formalism.
Context change potential: [[φ]]: context → context. Meaning is update function. Not static denotation. Dynamic interpretation.
Information states: σ: set of world-assignment pairs. ⟨w, g⟩ ∈ σ. g: variable assignment. Tracks discourse referents.
Update semantics: σ[[∃x.φ]] = ⋃_d σ[x↦d][[φ]]. Existential introduces referent. Available for later anaphora. Extends assignment.
Anaphora: "A man walked in. He sat down." ∃x.man(x) ∧ walked_in(x); sat_down(x). x bound across sentences. Dynamic binding.
DPL (Dynamic Predicate Logic): Groenendijk & Stokhof. Dynamic conjunction: φ; ψ. Sequential update. Existential scope extends.
Update with might (Veltman): σ[[might φ]] = σ if σ[[φ]] ≠ ∅, else ∅. Test, not update. Epistemic modality. Information-sensitive.
Presupposition: Presupposition = requirement on input context. Must be satisfied before update. Accommodation if not. Context manipulation.
Symbols.
| Symbol | Unicode | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| [[φ]] | — | update function |
| σ | U+03C3 | information state |
| ; | — | dynamic conjunction |
| [x↦d] | — | assignment update |
Metatheory. Context change. Anaphora. Information states. Update semantics.
Applies to. Formal semantics. Discourse analysis. Anaphora. Presupposition.
Limitations. Complexity. Multiple frameworks. Static/dynamic interface. Pragmatics boundary.
© 2026 Lingenic LLC