「‍」 Lingenic

Dynamic Semantics

(⤓.md ◇.md); γ ≜ [2026-07-17T120407.600, 2026-07-17T135416.643] ∧ |γ| = 3

Dynamic Semantics

Origin. Groenendijk, Stokhof, Veltman (1980s-90s). Meaning as context change. Anaphora resolution. Information update. Foundation of discourse semantics.

Models. Meaning = context change potential. Not truth conditions but update. Anaphora across sentences. Information states. Dynamic interpretation.

Formalism.

Context change potential: [[φ]]: context → context. Meaning is update function. Not static denotation. Dynamic interpretation.

Information states: σ: set of world-assignment pairs. ⟨w, g⟩ ∈ σ. g: variable assignment. Tracks discourse referents.

Update semantics: σ[[∃x.φ]] = ⋃_d σ[x↦d][[φ]]. Existential introduces referent. Available for later anaphora. Extends assignment.

Anaphora: "A man walked in. He sat down." ∃x.man(x) ∧ walked_in(x); sat_down(x). x bound across sentences. Dynamic binding.

DPL (Dynamic Predicate Logic): Groenendijk & Stokhof. Dynamic conjunction: φ; ψ. Sequential update. Existential scope extends.

Update with might (Veltman): σ[[might φ]] = σ if σ[[φ]] ≠ ∅, else ∅. Test, not update. Epistemic modality. Information-sensitive.

Presupposition: Presupposition = requirement on input context. Must be satisfied before update. Accommodation if not. Context manipulation.

Symbols.

SymbolUnicodeMeaning
[[φ]]update function
σU+03C3information state
;dynamic conjunction
[x↦d]assignment update

Metatheory. Context change. Anaphora. Information states. Update semantics.

Applies to. Formal semantics. Discourse analysis. Anaphora. Presupposition.

Limitations. Complexity. Multiple frameworks. Static/dynamic interface. Pragmatics boundary.

© 2026 Lingenic LLC