Counterpart Theory
Origin. Lewis (1968). No transworld identity. Counterparts represent de re. Modal realism. Foundation for modal metaphysics.
Models. Individuals world-bound. Counterpart relation C. De re modality via counterparts. No same object across worlds.
Formalism.
Counterpart relation: C(x, y, w₁, w₂): y in w₂ is counterpart of x in w₁. Similarity-based. Not transitive, not symmetric.
Possibility de re: ◇Fx (object a satisfies): ∃w∃y. w accessible ∧ C(a, y, @, w) ∧ Fy at w. Counterpart has F.
Necessity de re: □Fx (object a satisfies): ∀w∀y. (accessible(w) ∧ C(a, y, @, w)) → Fy at w. All counterparts have F.
No transworld identity: a exists only at actual world. "Same" across worlds = counterpart. Identity is world-bound.
Multiple counterparts: a may have many counterparts in w. Or none. Context determines which.
Inconstancy: Same sentence, different counterpart relations. "Humphrey might have won" vs "The loser might have won." Context-dependence.
Modal realism (Lewis): Other possible worlds exist. Concrete, real. Actuality is indexical.
Fictionalist variant: Worlds as fictions. Counterparts in fiction. Avoid ontological commitment.
Symbols.
| Symbol | Unicode | Name | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| C | — | Counterpart | Cross-world relation |
| @ | — | Actual | Current world |
| ◇_c | — | Possibility | Via counterpart |
| w | — | World | Possible world |
Metatheory. First-order formalization. No quantifying-in problems. Captures de re reading. Multiple systems.
Applies to. Modal metaphysics. Personal identity. Essentialism. Transworld identity.
Limitations. Counterpart selection. Inconstancy objections. Modal realism controversial. Counterintuitive for some.
© 2026 Lingenic LLC