Strict Conditional
Origin. Lewis (1912, 1918). Material conditional critique. Modal implication. S1-S5 systems. Foundation of modal logic.
Models. Necessity of conditional. Possible worlds. Lewis systems. Avoids paradoxes of material implication.
Formalism.
Strict conditional: A ⥽ B := □(A → B). Necessarily if A then B. Stronger than material. Modal definition.
Motivation: Material: A → B true when A false. Paradox: false implies anything. Strict: requires necessity. No vacuous truth from impossible antecedent.
Lewis systems: S1: minimal strict implication. S2: adds ◇(A ∧ B) → (◇A ∧ ◇B). S3: adds □(A → B) → (□A → □B). S4: adds □A → □□A. S5: adds ◇A → □◇A.
S2 characteristic: Consistency of conjunctions. If ◇(A ∧ B) then ◇A and ◇B. Modal distribution.
Strict implication properties: Transitive: (A ⥽ B) ∧ (B ⥽ C) → (A ⥽ C). Contrapositive: (A ⥽ B) → (¬B ⥽ ¬A). Not reflexive for S1.
Remaining paradox: □A → (B ⥽ A). Necessary truths strictly implied by anything. ◇¬A → (A ⥽ B) in some systems. Impossibilities strictly imply anything.
Relevance critique: Anderson-Belnap: strict not enough. Need variable sharing. Relevance logic response.
Symbols.
| Symbol | Unicode | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| ⥽ | U+297D | strict conditional |
| □ | U+25A1 | necessity |
| S1-S5 | — | Lewis systems |
| → | U+2192 | material conditional |
Metatheory. Modal implication. Lewis hierarchy. Necessity. Paradox reduction.
Applies to. Modal logic. Counterfactuals. Conditionals. History of logic.
Limitations. Paradoxes remain. Relevance issues. Which system? Material paradoxes not fully resolved.
© 2026 Lingenic LLC