「‍」 Lingenic

Signaling Game Logic

(⤓.md ◇.md); γ ≜ [2026-07-17T120407.600, 2026-07-17T135416.643] ∧ |γ| = 3

Signaling Game Logic

Origin. Lewis's signaling games (1969). Spence's signaling (economics, 1973). Game-theoretic semantics of communication. Logic for strategic information transmission. Foundation for pragmatics and mechanism design.

Models. Strategic communication. Sender has private information (type). Sender sends signal/message. Receiver updates beliefs, takes action. Payoffs depend on type, signal, action. Equilibrium: consistent beliefs and strategies.

Formalism.

Signaling game: G = (T, M, A, p, uS, uR) where:

  • T: sender types (private info)
  • M: messages (signals)
  • A: receiver actions
  • p: prior over types
  • uS, uR: payoff functions

Strategies:

  • σ: T → Δ(M) (sender: type to message distribution)
  • ρ: M → Δ(A) (receiver: message to action distribution)

Beliefs: μ: M → Δ(T) (receiver's belief given message) Bayesian: μ(t|m) = p(t)σ(m|t) / Σₜ' p(t')σ(m|t')

Equilibrium types:

  • Separating: different types send different messages
  • Pooling: all types send same message
  • Semi-separating: partial separation

Logical expressions: K_R(t | m): receiver knows type t given message m Signal(m) → Action(a): message induces action Truthful: σ(m|t) > 0 only if m "means" t

Symbols.

SymbolUnicodeNameMeaning
TTypesPrivate information
MMessagesSignals
AActionsReceiver choices
σU+03C3Sender strategyType to message
ρU+03C1Receiver strategyMessage to action
μU+03BCBeliefsPosterior on types
KKnowledgeEpistemic

Metatheory. Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium solution concept. Refinements: intuitive criterion, divine equilibrium. Cheap talk: costless signals, equilibria exist. Costly signaling: separation possible. Information design: sender's optimization.

Applies to. Economic signaling (education, advertising). Pragmatics (Gricean reasoning). Animal communication. Political communication. Mechanism design. Persuasion games.

Limitations. Equilibrium selection problem. Multiple equilibria common. Rationality assumptions strong. Dynamic extensions complex. Boundedly rational agents not modeled. Evolutionary alternatives exist.

© 2026 Lingenic LLC