「‍」 Lingenic

D Modal Logic

(⤓.md ◇.md); γ ≜ [2026-07-17T120407.600, 2026-07-17T135416.643] ∧ |γ| = 3

D Modal Logic

Origin. The D axiom (□p → ◇p) as seriality; von Wright's Deontic Logic (1951) is the source of the reading, Hintikka (1957) of the modal treatment, and Kripke's serial-frame semantics (1963) of the system. D = K + D, and Standard Deontic Logic is its normal extension. Serial frames. Ought implies can. Minimal deontic. Foundation of obligation logic.

Models. Serial accessibility. No dead ends. Obligation/permission. Deontic possibility always exists.

Formalism.

Language: □ as O (obligation). ◇ as P (permission). OA: A is obligatory. PA: A is permitted.

Axioms: K: O(A → B) → (OA → OB). D: OA → PA. Equivalently: ¬O⊥.

D axiom readings: OA → ¬O¬A. Obligation implies permission. Ought implies can. No obligation of impossibilities.

Frame condition: Seriality: ∀w∃v.wRv. Every world accesses some world. No moral dead ends. Ideals always exist.

Contrast with T: T: □A → A (truth). D: □A → ◇A (consistency). D weaker than T. Obligations not always fulfilled.

Extensions: KD4: deontic + transitive. KD45: + Euclidean. Standard Deontic Logic (SDL) variants.

Deontic operators: OA: obligatory. PA := ¬O¬A: permitted. FA := O¬A: forbidden. Optional: PA ∧ P¬A.

Paradoxes: Ross paradox: O(mail) → O(mail ∨ burn). Gentle murder. Good Samaritan. D doesn't solve all.

Symbols.

SymbolUnicodeMeaning
Dseriality axiom
Oobligation
Ppermission
Fforbidden

Metatheory. Serial frames. Deontic consistency. Weaker than T. Completeness.

Applies to. Deontic logic. Normative reasoning. Legal logic. Ethics.

Limitations. Paradoxes remain. Conflicting obligations. Contrary-to-duty. Too simple for real norms.

© 2026 Lingenic LLC