「‍」 Lingenic

Bounded Linear Logic

(⤓.md ◇.md); γ ≜ [2026-07-17T120407.600, 2026-07-17T135416.643] ∧ |γ| = 3

Bounded Linear Logic

Origin. Girard, Scedrov, Scott (1992). Polynomial-time complexity via bounded exponentials. !ⁿA: at most n copies of A. Implicit computational complexity. Light and soft linear logic variants.

Models. Resource usage bounded by polynomials. Exponentials with depth/level restrictions. Stratified modalities. Proofs as polynomial-time computations.

Formalism.

Bounded modalities: !ⁿA: at most n copies of A available !⁰A ≡ A (no reuse) !¹A: exactly once !ωA: unbounded (standard exponential)

Depth restrictions: Level assignment to formulas. !ᵢA: exponential at level i. Contraction only at lower levels.

Light Linear Logic (LLL): §A (paragraph): limited storage !A (of course): unlimited but restricted Captures PTIME.

Soft Linear Logic (SLL): Multiplexing instead of contraction. mux: !ⁿA ⊸ !(A ⊗ ... ⊗ A) (n times) Captures PTIME without stratification.

Elementary Linear Logic (ELL): Captures elementary time (tower of exponentials). !A ⊸ !!A not derivable.

Typing complexity: Proofs in BLL → polynomial-time normalization. No unbounded duplication chains.

Symbols.

SymbolUnicodeNameMeaning
!ⁿBounded bangn copies max
§U+00A7ParagraphLight storage
U+22B8LollipopLinear implication
U+2297TensorMultiplicative and

Metatheory. Soundness for complexity classes. PTIME (LLL, SLL), PSPACE, EXPTIME characterizations. Cut elimination in polynomial steps. Implicit complexity correspondence.

Applies to. Complexity theory. Implicit computational complexity. Resource-bounded computation. Certified complexity. Polynomial-time λ-calculi.

Limitations. Programming restrictive. Multiple variants. Expressiveness vs complexity tradeoffs. Not mainstream for verification. Theoretical focus.

© 2026 Lingenic LLC